After ZARA and H&M were exposed to quality problems such as discoloration of clothes and excessive composition, many big names fell into the "quality door." On August 23, 2011, Greenpeace, an international environmental organization, released the report "Poisoning in Clothing - Investigation of Remains of Toxic and Harmful Substances in Global Brand Clothing". The report states that Li Ning, Nike, Converse, Uniqlo, and Adidas The products of 14 famous brands contain toxic and hazardous substances.
This material, which is known as NPE (Nonylphenol Polyoxyethylene Ether), is a material that is involved in the whirlpool of well-known brands. What is NPE? What harm does it have?
NPE is widely used in the textile industry for printing, dyeing and cleaning processes. It is a very important non-ionic surfactant with good wetting, emulsification, dispersion, decontamination and anti-static capabilities. it is good. NPE is widely used in detergents, textiles, pesticides, coatings, leather, building materials, paper and other industries. NPE is a polymer that is not dangerous in itself, but once NPE enters the environment, it quickly decomposes into a more toxic environmental hormone, NP, which is nonylphenol. NP is persistent and bioaccumulative. That is to say, once it is discharged into the environment, it will exist for a long time, and it can enter the food chain, and enlarges step by step through the food chain. At the same time, it also has the effect of mimicking estrogen, so once it enters the body, it will affect the normal reproduction and development of the organism, which can lead to a decrease in the number of sperm in human males. NPE is recognized worldwide as an environmental hormone. Research shows that even if the concentration of this substance is very low, it is extremely dangerous.
From April to May 2011, Greenpeace purchased 78 samples of 15 clothing brands in 18 countries including China, the United Kingdom, and Argentina, including sportswear, casual wear and footwear. The origin of these samples involved 13 textile producing countries such as China, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. Greenpeace sent the samples to a qualified third-party laboratory for testing. The results showed that 2/3 of the samples including Adidas, Li Ning, etc. were detected to contain NPE. Among them, Li Ning's 4 samples, Younger's 3 samples, and Abercombie & Fitch's 3 samples all detected NPE, which are the three "all-arms" brands.
NPE was detected in the products of 14 clothing brands, which undoubtedly attracted people's attention.
Among the apparel brands involved, Li Ning is the fastest-speaking Chinese company. On August 22 and 24, they issued a statement on the official website, not only focusing on the issue of whether the product meets the EU REACH standard. The answer also made a positive commitment to achieve environmentally friendly emissions in the supply chain.
On the evening of August 23rd, Adidas issued a statement saying that the test results mentioned in the report indicated that the NPE concentration of Adidas was far below the target value, and most of the Adidas products tested did not detect NPE (in 9 samples tested). None of the 5 items contained NPE). Adidas has strictly adhered to the standard of NPE concentration of 100ppm, which is the best measure implemented in the industry. Nike and Hummer reacted positively, saying that all toxic and hazardous substances in their supply chains will be phased out by 2020, and an open plan of action will be formulated in the near future.
The person in charge of the Youngor Group Propaganda Department told the reporter of “Daily Economic News†that they saw the report the first time they responded. She said, “These three products have passed the third-party testing report and are in line with GB18401. Standards, however, "We sent the samples to third-party inspections again, but the results have not yet come out. At the same time, we have put forward requirements for the upstream supply chain."
Nike and Hummer reacted positively, saying that all toxic and hazardous substances in their supply chains will be phased out by 2020, and an open plan of action will be formulated in the near future.
Professor Dong Yanming from Xiamen University’s School of Materials said that according to current knowledge, NPEs that are left on clothing, whether due to fabric dyeing or washing, will not directly harm the human body. There is no evidence that under wear conditions, NPE will be absorbed or broken down into toxic NPs.
Chaoyang ** dermatologist Cao Mei reminded that the new clothes must be washed and sun. Washing fresh clothes with salt water can disinfect, sterilize and prevent fading; cotton heat-resistant clothes can also be disinfected with boiling water. Exposure to direct sunlight for more than 2 hours allows formaldehyde and other toxic gases to evaporate.
After the “Toxic Clothing Door†incident occurred, the reporter found during the visit to the counters of these famous brands that the “Drug Gate†did not affect the sales volume. The clerk said that they were unaware of it and had not received any information from consumers yet. Complaints or company-related notices. Some consumers expressed that after the “Toxic Clothing Door†incident, they still insisted on choosing branded clothing. They believe that well-known brands should continue to survive and will certainly rectify their production after the event is exposed. This shows that consumers trust Li Ning, NIKE and other branded apparel. The degree is relatively high.
This material, which is known as NPE (Nonylphenol Polyoxyethylene Ether), is a material that is involved in the whirlpool of well-known brands. What is NPE? What harm does it have?
NPE is widely used in the textile industry for printing, dyeing and cleaning processes. It is a very important non-ionic surfactant with good wetting, emulsification, dispersion, decontamination and anti-static capabilities. it is good. NPE is widely used in detergents, textiles, pesticides, coatings, leather, building materials, paper and other industries. NPE is a polymer that is not dangerous in itself, but once NPE enters the environment, it quickly decomposes into a more toxic environmental hormone, NP, which is nonylphenol. NP is persistent and bioaccumulative. That is to say, once it is discharged into the environment, it will exist for a long time, and it can enter the food chain, and enlarges step by step through the food chain. At the same time, it also has the effect of mimicking estrogen, so once it enters the body, it will affect the normal reproduction and development of the organism, which can lead to a decrease in the number of sperm in human males. NPE is recognized worldwide as an environmental hormone. Research shows that even if the concentration of this substance is very low, it is extremely dangerous.
From April to May 2011, Greenpeace purchased 78 samples of 15 clothing brands in 18 countries including China, the United Kingdom, and Argentina, including sportswear, casual wear and footwear. The origin of these samples involved 13 textile producing countries such as China, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. Greenpeace sent the samples to a qualified third-party laboratory for testing. The results showed that 2/3 of the samples including Adidas, Li Ning, etc. were detected to contain NPE. Among them, Li Ning's 4 samples, Younger's 3 samples, and Abercombie & Fitch's 3 samples all detected NPE, which are the three "all-arms" brands.
NPE was detected in the products of 14 clothing brands, which undoubtedly attracted people's attention.
Among the apparel brands involved, Li Ning is the fastest-speaking Chinese company. On August 22 and 24, they issued a statement on the official website, not only focusing on the issue of whether the product meets the EU REACH standard. The answer also made a positive commitment to achieve environmentally friendly emissions in the supply chain.
On the evening of August 23rd, Adidas issued a statement saying that the test results mentioned in the report indicated that the NPE concentration of Adidas was far below the target value, and most of the Adidas products tested did not detect NPE (in 9 samples tested). None of the 5 items contained NPE). Adidas has strictly adhered to the standard of NPE concentration of 100ppm, which is the best measure implemented in the industry. Nike and Hummer reacted positively, saying that all toxic and hazardous substances in their supply chains will be phased out by 2020, and an open plan of action will be formulated in the near future.
The person in charge of the Youngor Group Propaganda Department told the reporter of “Daily Economic News†that they saw the report the first time they responded. She said, “These three products have passed the third-party testing report and are in line with GB18401. Standards, however, "We sent the samples to third-party inspections again, but the results have not yet come out. At the same time, we have put forward requirements for the upstream supply chain."
Nike and Hummer reacted positively, saying that all toxic and hazardous substances in their supply chains will be phased out by 2020, and an open plan of action will be formulated in the near future.
Professor Dong Yanming from Xiamen University’s School of Materials said that according to current knowledge, NPEs that are left on clothing, whether due to fabric dyeing or washing, will not directly harm the human body. There is no evidence that under wear conditions, NPE will be absorbed or broken down into toxic NPs.
Chaoyang ** dermatologist Cao Mei reminded that the new clothes must be washed and sun. Washing fresh clothes with salt water can disinfect, sterilize and prevent fading; cotton heat-resistant clothes can also be disinfected with boiling water. Exposure to direct sunlight for more than 2 hours allows formaldehyde and other toxic gases to evaporate.
After the “Toxic Clothing Door†incident occurred, the reporter found during the visit to the counters of these famous brands that the “Drug Gate†did not affect the sales volume. The clerk said that they were unaware of it and had not received any information from consumers yet. Complaints or company-related notices. Some consumers expressed that after the “Toxic Clothing Door†incident, they still insisted on choosing branded clothing. They believe that well-known brands should continue to survive and will certainly rectify their production after the event is exposed. This shows that consumers trust Li Ning, NIKE and other branded apparel. The degree is relatively high.
Public, utility, and construction staff need to stay safe in low-light or in the dark, but so does everyone else. Grey in the daytime but reflective at night, they have a soft, smooth exterior. Mostly, a firm, high-quality polyester/silk blend outer with the elastic reflective cloth of a 96/4 terylene/spandex blend. What`s more, the polyester wadding on the inside of all our jackets is puffy, elastic, durable, and washable.Our clothing material has flame retardant effect, there will be no fire burning.
Flame Retardant Garment,Flame Retardant Coverall,Flame Resistance Jacket,Flame Retardant Vest
Yongkang Oti Safety Products Industry Co., LTD , http://www.qbanppe.com