The event was exposed to the "Da Vinci Home" event for a month, and the event has made new progress. Yesterday, Beijing Yingke Law Firm, Mr. Jiang Suhua, revealed at the Legal Risk Prevention Symposium of the Home Improvement Industry in Hubei Province that more than 100 Da Vinci home consumers have passed the collective rights protection. After some Shanghai consumers started the litigation judicial process, some consumers in Beijing In the near future, Da Vinci’s home will be filed for judicial proceedings. Lawyer Jiang Suhua introduced that although the amount of collective claims for 100 consumers has exceeded 100 million yuan, from the information available, the average amount of Dafenchi households purchased by each consumer is not much, and the average is about one million yuan. 400,000 - 500,000. It has been a month since the Da Vinci incident. Why is it that only a small number of consumers in Shanghai have initiated judicial proceedings, and Jiang Suhua has revealed the reasons. "We have been waiting for the relevant departments of the country to come forward and provide some convenience, such as some data, we can't get it." Jiang Suhua said that only by having the exact evidence, it is conducive to helping consumers collectively defend their rights. Consumer attitudes around the world - On July 18th, the Shanghai Consumers Association announced that it has received more than 50 complaints and consultations against Da Vinci's home, requesting returns or compensation. Da Vinci's furniture director and spokesperson Huang Zhixin also said that he has received dozens of consumer refund requests, but most of them are consumers who have not yet received the goods, and have not returned them due to quality problems. On the morning of August 4, the first batch of Da Vinci home consumers submitted a complaint to the Jing’an District Court. According to Li Renzheng, a lawyer at Beijing Yingke (Shanghai) Law Firm, the plaintiffs who filed two complaints with the court this morning were all Shanghai consumers. One of them bought more than 100,000 yuan of furniture and the other bought more than 200,000 yuan. Furniture. Both of them demanded a refund of one on the grounds that Da Vinci was suspected of fraud in the country of origin. This afternoon, another Da Vinci consumer will also file a complaint with the court, and the amount of Da Vinci furniture purchased is about 500,000 yuan. At about 10 am on August 10, eight men came to Chengdu Da Vinci's home store, pulled two chairs in the store and blocked them at the door of the store, asking Da Vinci to return. After five hours of consultation with Da Vinci's home, eight men left at around 2 pm, claiming that Leonardo da Vinci had to give them a satisfactory answer and will come to the door today. According to a security guard working near Da Vinci's home, at around 10 am on the 10th, a modern SUV and a Jetta car arrived at the door of the Finch home store. Eight men from the car were wearing T-shirt and black and white shirts. After looking at Da Vinci's store door, eight men sneaked into the store. Among them, two men pulled the Versace chair at the door of the store to block their store door and sit down. Others entered the house and negotiated with the front desk. Recently, Mr. Wei sued Hangzhou Da Vinci Trading Co., Ltd. to Hangzhou Gongshu District People's Court. This is the first lawsuit related to the dispute in Hangzhou after the sensational Da Vinci incident. On May 4 this year, Mr. Wei purchased furniture from Hangzhou Da Vinci. At that time, the salesperson of this company repeatedly guaranteed that 100% of the Cabrera furniture they sold was made in Italy and imported, so Mr. Wei Signed a "sales agreement" with the defendant, and purchased the imported Italian CAPPELLETTI (including Cabernet) from the defendant, including bed and cabinet, etc., for more than 2.9 million yuan. On May 31, the two parties signed an agreement again, and Mr. Wei purchased more than 320,000 yuan of CAPPELLETTI furniture. According to Mr. Wei's request, “Da Vinci†designed the purchase and placement of furniture, and provided a design plan to Mr. Wei. Mr. Wei paid a total of 3.23 million yuan to them in four times. Mr. Wei believes that Hangzhou Da Vinci Trading Co., Ltd. has false propaganda and deceives consumers. When he signed a "sales agreement" with himself, he was suspected of fraud. Therefore, he filed a lawsuit and demanded that the court order the cancellation of the sales agreement and the defendant refunded the payment of the payment of 3,234,849 yuan. The defendant compensated the plaintiff for a loss of 700,000 yuan and the defendant was responsible for the litigation fee. Liu Lin, a lawyer from Beijing Shuangli Law Firm, entrusted Chen Yongfu to the Chaoyang police on August 3, requesting that Da Vinci’s criminal liability for “false advertising crimes†and “production and sale of fake and inferior goods†be investigated, and that Da Vinci The constitution of criminal offences will be related to consumers' rights protection claims. The reporter learned from the Chaoyang police that the investigation team received the report lawyer, learned the situation, and collected the report materials of the reporter. Related work is in progress. The Da Vinci storm continues. The reporter called Da Vinci PR on five issues such as consumer claims. One question: Does the agent have to be responsible for Da Vinci's agents and distributors of internationally renowned brands for product quality, and do not need to be responsible for product quality? If the agent’s product has a problem, it will damage his reputation in China. Is he asking the manufacturer for compensation? In this regard, Da Vinci furniture public relations Mr. Huang told reporters that Da Vinci furniture has been passed with Italian producers, and will take responsibility with manufacturers such as Kabri, to provide better services for consumers. Second question: What is the specific scope of the "no problem" product? Although Da Vinci Furniture said in an open letter that it has opened a hotline and sincerely solved the consumer problem, but did not make specific uniform provisions for the return of goods, nor on the company's website. Specific instructions for the relevant returned goods. Three questions: Is it necessary for consumers to pay for the inspection fee? Da Vinci will not only require the consumer to show the invoice, purchase contract and other certificates, but also ask the consumer to find the relevant department for quality inspection. Only confirm the quality problems of this set of furniture. I will talk about the return. Four questions: Why do you fail to pay ten, why did you not fulfill the Guangzhou consumer Ms. Zhang recently told the media that Da Vinci transferred the product refund to her, but refused to fulfill her promise of “fake a penalty of tenâ€. Five questions: Did you provide furniture to Tomson? On July 12th, it was reported that Tomson Yipin of Shanghai Luxury House had a cooperative relationship with him. According to the Tomson Group, Tomson has only cooperated with Versace Home in the model room and design, but has no cooperation with Da Vinci.
Wall-Hung Toilet,swim jacuzzi,salt water swim spa,inground jacuzzi,hot tub and swim spa
Guangzhou Aijingsi Sanitary Products Co.,Ltd , https://www.hottubdesign.com